<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Ipv4 on Kentrow</title><link>https://kentrow.fr/en/tags/ipv4/</link><description>Recent content in Ipv4 on Kentrow</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>© 2026 Kentrow</copyright><lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://kentrow.fr/en/tags/ipv4/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>IPv8: the IETF draft that wants to bring IPv4 back from the dead</title><link>https://kentrow.fr/en/posts/ipv8-le-brouillon-qui-veut-ressusciter-ipv4/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://kentrow.fr/en/posts/ipv8-le-brouillon-qui-veut-ressusciter-ipv4/</guid><description>&lt;p>No, this is not a joke or a typo. After years of hearing &amp;ldquo;IPv6 is the future&amp;rdquo;, an engineer has submitted a &lt;a href="https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-thain-ipv8-00.html" target="_blank">draft to the IETF&lt;/a> to propose&amp;hellip; &lt;strong>IPv8&lt;/strong>. The idea? Rather than keep pushing IPv6 (which nobody has managed to fully deploy in 25 years), we start from an extended IPv4 base instead. And honestly, on paper, it looks rather promising.&lt;/p></description><media:content xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://kentrow.fr/posts/ipv8-le-brouillon-qui-veut-ressusciter-ipv4/feature.jpg"/></item></channel></rss>